Do you know about - method Writing
Nursing Home Nyc! Again, for I know. Ready to share new things that are useful. You and your friends.When I was a kid in high school, I read a short story from an English Lit textbook that deeply impressed me. The story concerned an inventory of an innocent black man in the Deep South, circa 1930s, being lynched by a mob for rape. I can't recall the title now, but I had concept it was entitled "The Sheriff," though I cannot find a reference to it on search engines. What impressed me so much about the story was that it was told from the point-of-view of the town's sheriff, and not entirely unsympathetically. The character is portrayed as more craven than evil, and the reader is privy to his thoughts as he rationalizes away his inaction, though it is clear he is not at all comfortable with the impending violence and injustice. He does have a conscience, but he's not willing to risk his office or worse for the victim's sake.
What I said. It isn't outcome that the actual about Nursing Home Nyc. You read this article for information on a person want to know is Nursing Home Nyc.How is method Writing
What so impressed me about the story was that it was written by an African-American author and convincingly so!
I saw a television movie about the early years of the Aids epidemic. The plot revolves around a group of homosexual friends from Nyc. One of them is a writer for a soap opera. While watching an part while vacationing on Fire Island, the writer laments, "They all the time give me the queer scenes to write." When one of his friends notes, "That's only natural," the man retorts [something like], "If I can't write a convincing old lady in a nursing home, then I'm not worth my salt as a writer."
At that, I concept to myself, "Hear! Hear!" Now there's a man with some pro pride in his craft; a pride that transcends who or what he is.
In Herman Wouk's epics *The Winds of War* and its sequel *War and Remembrance*, interspersed within the plot are the memoirs of a fictional German field marshal during Ww Ii. Wouk--who is of Jewish heritage--effectively writes this character, from his point of view, and how this Prussian aristocrat rationalizes away the unmitigated evil of the Third Reich and even the Holocaust in a convincing manner-in the character's mind. I often wondered if writing this was distasteful for Mr. Wouk. If or if not, he is a pro with the rare capacity to put his mind into that of another's and faithfully report the character's motivations, concept processes and extenuations for his actions.
Satirists have long delighted in deriding "method acting," which teaches that an actor should try to "become" his character. That is, try to think, feel and acknowledge as the character would. Nevertheless, Lee Strasberg's The Actors Studio has produced such paramount actors as Al Pacino, Rod Steiger and Robert De Niro. Strasberg himself, after an absence of over thirty years from acting, rendered an extremely good and convincing doing as Hyman Roth in *The Godfather, Part Ii*.
Many of the writers I admire most, Shakespeare, Puzo, Graves and Wouk, to name a few salient examples, all seemed to have that rare gift of being able to fully understand an additional one person, regardless how alien the character's nature might be to that of the writer's. I often wondered if such an apparent gift is plainly a talent natural to such population from early childhood, or rather whether anyone can train himself or herself straight through some form of "method writing" to do likewise.
Are most writers doomed to strictly corollary the oldest admonition to writers in the book: "Write what you know about," or can we heed the guidance of an English trainer in a movie I once saw who retorted rhetorically: "What did Shakespeare know about Venetian Moors?"
My concept on the branch follows.
I'm not marvelous to teach a policy in creative writing. Aside from lacking credentials, I'm plainly not very creative. Nevertheless, on a hypothetical basis if I were to teach such a course, I think on the first day of class I would ask--without explaining why--all those gift who favor legalized abortion to raise their hands. I would then instruct, as my first assignment, all those with their hands raised to write an argumentative paper concerning the branch from the opposite point-of-view; i.e., the "pro-life" side. I would then tell the remainder to write an argumentative paper from the perspective of a typical "pro-choice" adherent.
The next day if I received back papers (as I expect I would) like: "I oppose legalized abortion because I am a Bible-totin', Bible-quotin' religious fanatic of a Neanderthal who favors a patriarchal society, and forcing women to bear unwanted children is an productive way to keep them downtrodden and dependent upon and subservient to men;" and conversely, "I favor legalized abortion because I am an immoral, hedonistic atheist, or crypto-atheist, who cares nothing about anyone but myself and my own pleasures and interests; who would snuff out the life of an unborn child within the womb if favorable with no more compunction than I would have stepping upon an insect," then I would mark all such papers with an "F."
I would write, "You are telling me what you think about your opponents on this issue, not what they think, which is what I asked for. Now please try again."
I am not suggesting that a writer must be strictly objective about matters, or that a novelist cannot write a novel with whether a "pro-choice" or a "pro-life" message, anymore than I would suggest that Harriet Beecher Stowe could not have written a very effective, immensely influential anti-slavery book. However, before doing so I would suggest that any such writer read over *Uncle Tom's Cabin* as an example of good (i.e., effective) propaganda. (I use the word "propaganda" in its primary sense, before the word acquired a sinister connotation as the corollary of twentieth century political events. It plainly means putting forth a point of view in an exertion to persuade.) As with any other exertion in life, if you want to be a propagandist, then be a good propagandist. Mrs. Stowe had been an exceptionally good one.
Mrs. Stowe's landmark novel was so productive authentically because she did exhibit the potential to understand how others felt about matters, along with those who disagreed with her. She was too shrewd (and I think too honest) to caricature all slaveholders as demonic. If she had painted all slaveholders as she did the villainous Simon Legree, the book would have lost much of its effectiveness as population would have known from personal caress and from having heard from others that such was plainly not true, and the author would have lost much of her credibility along with that of her book.
There were authentically Simon Legree types, but there were also many slaveholders who treated their slaves kindly, which she acknowledged in the book, and even that there were many slaves apprehensive and ambivalent about the idea of freedom-and then effectively countered that seminar in favor of slavery by recounting a real incident in the book's afterwards.
(If you want a prime example of bad (ineffective) propaganda, then I'd suggest you watch the movie *Reefer Madness*, which I understand has become a sort of cult popular among "potheads" who delight in getting "high" while laughing their way straight through it.)
This is not a political article, and I want no notes addressed to me concerning views about abortion. I have not expressed any here, nor shall I. I use this single example because it is such an emotional and volatile issue revolving around the status of a fetus. The two conflicting and emotionally-charged points of view concerning this issue are plainly irreconcilable. As with all such emotional issues, we tend to attribute base "ulterior" motivations to our opponents because we are so firmly convinced of the correctness of our own position that we must finish that any who will not accept our arguments must be unwilling to do so out of some mendacious and malevolent ulterior motive.
If you wish to feel this way about those who do not agree with your views concerning abortion, then I'd suggest you become a political activist. However, if you are willing to try to fully understand why those holding the opposite viewpoint so do and accurately report it in fiction, then I believe you will make a first class writer!
I hope you will get new knowledge about Nursing Home Nyc. Where you can offer use within your life. And most importantly, your reaction is Nursing Home Nyc.Read more.. at Yahoo method Writing. View Related articles related to Nursing Home Nyc. I Roll below. I actually have recommended my friends to assist share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share method Writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment